You might be wondering….

April 12, 2011

where we’ve got to. Then again you might not, I’m a bit rubbish at updating here very regularly. But I do have a proper legitmate excuse this time.

Earlier on this year we packed our lives into a rather old campervan and after many, many months of planning we headed off taking ourselves on the road for a year. We’re travelling around the UK WWOOFing. 

Internet access is limited but I’m trying to keep a fairly regular blog of our adventures over at www.wonderingwanderers.co.uk so please do come over and catch up with us there.

Motivating Factors

November 5, 2010

I’ve been thinking a bit about motivation recently. I have Home Ed friends who use tick sheets to mark off time spent on various educational tasks over the course of a week. Some translate those ticks into rewards, some are motivated simply by a nice full sheet of ticks. Some say they like to have a visual marker of what has been acheived, some want some nice hard evidence for the LA should they come calling. Many of my friends tell me *they* are lazy and need external motivation to do stuff and indeed our whole society is set up in this way really so for most people it’s a good tool for the future as well.

You often hear people ‘rewarding’ themselves. I see status updates on facebook of people listing all they had just done: shopping, tidying, cooking and finishing with their reward - a cup of tea, a sit down, a slice of cake.

We work, very often in jobs we don’t like or get fulfillment from for our pay packet, our 4 weeks holiday a year, our decent pension so we can enjoy our retirement.

We encourage our children to eat their vegetables at tea time, with the lure of pudding afterwards.

We tell them to be good so Father Christmas comes each Christmas and rewards them with a sackful of shiny wrapped presents.

We introduce the concept of pocket money, often giving the chance to earn it by doing tasks around the house and give them disposable income or talk of saving up for more expensive consumerism.

As I said for most this is perfect training for life. Our society is set up on the basis that if you do X, you will get Y. Work hard, revise, pass your exams, get pieces of paper to prove you are qualified which should translate into a better paid job. Work hard, work long get pieces of paper in exchange for your labour to enable you to buy stuff.

Does this work? I’m not entirely sure.

 It didn’t work for me. I worked quite hard at school, got my pieces of paper and went on to do A levels. I didn’t work quite as hard as I got distracted by shiny things ;) (insert your own ideas of what those shiny things might be ;) ). I did get back on track and worked hard, got pieces of paper to buy stuff with a job title which meant nothing outside of the walls of where I worked but *everything* in there, but as I spent most of my time inside those walls anyway that was all that mattered. This time I didn’t get distracted by shiny things but I could feel that this was not the be all and end all it had been made out to be. I had different priorities, like a life! I then stepped off the carousel altogether and threw myself into my current life. A wife - no pieces of paper, no promotion prospects; a mother - no leaving certificate or graduation ceremony, various voluntary work or sponsored charity things, the odd piece of paper but to be passed on to someone else rather than exchanged for stuff to fill my life up with.

 

Does it work for others? I don’t know, you’d need to ask them that. But in the main I hear more gripes about Monday mornings than Friday evenings, more enthusiasm for time spent with family or friends than with workmates, more passion about leisure activities than paid for ones. Of course it is often those pieces of paper that pay for the enjoyed times, I do see that link. I just think we all too often have the balance wrong. We feel we *need* or *deserve* the things we use the money for to make up for how much we hate what we do in order to get the money. When you start to strip that away you wonder whether if we did less of the work we’d need less of the reward. I’m not saying no work and no reward but maybe you need to slide it all backwards a bit, maybe the reward is simply less of the work in the first place, maybe it’s about finding the joy in the act of the task itself and if there is no joy then maybe just not doing it.

We know ourselves and our children best, or we should. I think most Home Educators certainly are in touch with their children and understand them. I think knowing ourselves well enough to establish what we want and what is the best route of getting there. For us it’s predominantly paper-free :)

Shamed into action!

October 20, 2010

I’ve seen a couple of references to ‘the blogring’ on a couple of friends’ blogs and noticed a few people blogging about matters educational. Also Jax has made noises about tidying the blogring up admin wise and it reminded me I’ve not been here for quite some time.

So I’ve been in and swept away some cobwebs, changed the picture for Monster to a more up to date one and changed his age (he turned 10 last month, it still said 9) and then thought actually maybe I should write something while I’m here.

I’ve been blogging now for about 7 years. My first blog bore the name that this blog here has ‘Monster and Teeny’ as those were the nicknames of the children. Back then Monster was 2 and Teeny, well she was teeny. We were newcomers to the Home Ed world, still finding our feet and our path and meeting new friends along the way. I joined the Early Years Home Ed yahoo group (back then it was Muddlepuddle), started a blog and joined the blogring and signed up for camps and groups and bought a shelf full of books.

Over the years that original blog has become more of a diary, it’s all still there and I still keep it updated but it is very much written for me these days. I still share it with a few friends and one day the children can read it too but it’s not about Home Ed as such and therefore doesn’t belong on a blogring sitting under a Home Ed banner. I started this blog because when I read round the blogring a few years ago I realised there was no one doing Home Ed quite like we do and I know that in our early days it was the online support of yahoo groups and reading about the highs and lows of other Home Educators daily lives that inspired me, gave me faith and kept me going.

The thing is though, I often don’t have much to say about Home Education. Not in a blog post anyway. I could sit and talk about Home Ed and my beliefs about parenting and child rearing and education and how people learn all day every day (and often do). I could share the highs but it would feel like bragging or being smug about believing my way is the right way, I could bemoan the lows but it would feel like wallowing, trying hard to find the glass half emptiness when actually I’m pretty much always a glass half full type of woman.

I could just slip quietly away and leave this here, Monster forever 9 (well 10 now), Teeny forever 7, the top post remaining a day in 2010 when we visited friends and checked on some sheep for people to find and wonder if we ever carried on and grew up, moved on or just stayed there trapped like characters in a book, ending when the last page was turned and the cover snapped shut.

And you know what, in times to come that may well happen :lol: But for today I am back here, with something to say, so I’ll say it and see what happens next.

I’ve been reading lots about approaches to Home Ed recently and enjoying hearing how different families use motivational tools, record progress, mark off achievements, follow bought in curriculums and what their aims for the future are. These all seem to be working well for the families who use them and I love reading about just that - Home Ed in progress, succeeding for those doing it :) . It’s heartening to hear about so many different approaches all working in different ways for different families and really does go to show how education should be diverse, tailor made, reactive and evolving, individualised and smooth, happy and enjoyable. 

We don’t use workbooks or curriculums. We don’t have ticksheets, incentives or motivational tools. Philosophically I am opposed to carrots and sticks, extrinsic rewards, stickers, tick boxes and certificates. I don’t judge those who use them and for whom they work but they are not for me. I have read Punished by rewards and I subscribe to the way of thinking outlined in that. If they don’t feel right for you, if they are not working, if the sense of achievement you were seeking isn’t met at the end of a week with every box ticked then that is fine in my opinion. Think instead about what motivates *you*. Is it the journey or the destination? Is it the process or the result? Is it all or indeed none of the above? What is your desired end point and by which route would you like to arrive there? 

For us our end result is happy, healthy children. Of course happy and healthy are both subjective and indeed altogether too dependent on external and out-of-our-hands factors. Currently both my children have colds and earlier on today as a result of a minor squabble in the back of the car I yelled at them. At that moment they would have appeared neither happy nor healthy with snotty noses and sad faces but I certainly don’t take that as a fail.

So let me amend that slightly. My end result is young adults who are able to identify and articulate what they need and desire to make them happy and healthy and understand how to and are motivated to achieve those states themselves.

I often describe our Home Ed style as autonomous. If that is met with a blank look I elaborate that it is child led but in theory it is still facilitated by me. I spend a good proportion of my time signed up to email lists, reading about things on the internet, looking out events and courses and day trips that the children would enjoy. I order books and dvds and find things on the TV that might interest them. I am the one who manages the diary and books in visits to friends, days at home, mixes the early starts with a slower morning here and there, does the driving, checks we can afford it and suggests half an hour running round the garden when things are getting fraught. I think there is a common misconception of autonomous home ed that parents have a laissez faire attitude towards education and parenting in general and allow their children to do whatever they want, whenever they want and remain hands off.

So I see my role as a listener, a suggester, an introducer. I hear them make requests, see sparks of interest and find ways of helping them learn more. We intersperse visits to places with TV documentaries, real life visits to shops, banks, libraries, museums, pick-your-own farms and pretty much anywhere and everywhere else that crops up in real life.

Could you do it this way? Maybe. A good friend once said to me that if she’d had my children she might have considered autonomous Home Ed, but as she had her children instead their rather more structured method was more appropriate. I often wonder if Monster and Teeny had a different mother things would be different too. I guess what I am saying is it has to work for every ‘partner’ or ’stakeholder’ in the equation. You need to find the right path for you and for your child(ren), the one that makes you all more or less happy, has a potential end result you are all satisfied with the propsect of and committed to achieving, one that suits you all and fits in with the rest of your lives, which does none of you any harm.

Bad days? Well yes of course we have those, we are human beings and therefore prone to messing it up fairly regularly, falling out, being unkind, shouting, screaming and stamping our feet, not thinking of others, losing our patience and our tempers,  having a bad day, changing our minds and generally having moments where the everyone else doubts they can spend another minute in our company let alone day in day out contact. I suspect that is simply par for the course in every family though. Sometimes we even have a bad day or a bad run of days at which point we all sit down, thrash it out, agree to all try harder and move on with renewed committment to making our lifestyle work.

Sixth annual photoblog day

May 26, 2010

Six? How did that happen then?!

I seem to be slipping later each year and like last year I struggled to find anything like a typical day around here. I guess the answer to that one is there is no such thing as a typical day around here but today had plenty of what is important to us, what we strive for, what plays a big part of our lives and where we are right now. 

That includes friends, learning something new every day, seeking out new experiences and firsts, stepping up to responsibilities, laughing, singing, talking, nature and animals, learning from others in all sorts of different environments, giving our time and working together, relaxing and enjoying each others company. Today we spent a lot of time in the car which isn’t ideal and doesn’t necessarily characterise how we live our lives but it is certainly one of our biggest expenses and resources.

 

So we started the day off with breakfast, getting dressed and so on. No photos of that as we were all up and moving at different times but were out of the house pretty early today so here’s our first photo of us leaving the house and getting into the car, otherwise known as the Nicmobile

 

First stop was some chalk downland about 10 miles away.

 

I have been doing volunteering as a shepherd or ‘lookerer’ for the local council. This involves being on a rota to visit a small flock (currently just nine) of sheep kept grazing to protect local chalk downland and reduce the use of fossil fuelled grasscutting machinery. The scheme has been running for a while and is working really well with the flock checked twice daily by volunteers. I attended a one day course last year to learn more about sheep and grazing for conservation, how to ‘turn’ a sheep, common sheep ailments and symptoms to look out for, errecting and maintaining a temporary electric fence enclosure and more. I have passed all this knowledge onto Monster and Teeny and the come along with me and do most of the lookering themselves with me just nominally supervising. Last week we had the excitement of a limping sheep that we managed to catch so I could inspect it and report my findings to the shepherd. Today we had another limping sheep, although not so bad so we didn’t bother to catch it but just reported it to the shepherd who was attending this afternoon anyway.

So Monster and Teeny head count the sheep, check they are all able to get up, walk and run, cast an eye around the perimeter fence for damage and check the sheep have water. 

 

We also enjoyed a bit of a Fox & Child moment watching a vixen and her four cubs playing in the sunshine in the next field along. We were too far away to get a decent picture and as we tried to move closer they scarpered but it was lovely to catch the glimpse of them :) .

Back to the car: 

This time back past home and 20 miles the other way to a localish marina where some new friends have their boat anchored. We only met them last week but hit it off and arranged to meet up again today. They are Home Educators with a same-age-as Teeny daughter and a slightly-older-than Monster daughter (who is currently in school but about to come back out. They sold up everything to buy a boat and go off sailing, boat-school the girls and generally live their dream. After some amazing adventures they are back in the UK for a while to earn some cash, repair the boat and recuperate before planning to head off again.

The marina is very posh indeed with many boats costing far more than most of us will earn in a lifetime let alone have spare to spend.

We fell rather instantly in love with their boat :)

Monster for it’s playground / home /adventure setting all rolled into one:)

Teeny for the wildlife that came calling :)

and me for the fab design features making the most of every bit of space - loved the little galley :)

 

We had chats, playing, explored the boat and had some lunch before heading for a wander round the marina and over to the beach for beachcombing, crab collecting and erm, pretending to be a seaweed monster from the deep! :lol:

Back to the car again this time heading for home for a couple of hours. Home is just as important to us as out and about and if we don’t have at least one day every fortnight with nothing planned but hanging out at home we all start to get a bit burnt out.

Teeny made herself very busy, first she took her ducklings out. She hatched them 2 and a half weeks ago from eggs she’d been incubating and they have imprinted on her and think she’s their mummy :) You can read more about the Hatchwatch 2010 adventure over on our self-suffish blog. They are currently still living in a box in Teeny’s bedroom at nighttime but are now able to go out in the garden for most of the day providing we’re around to protect them from seagull or other bird of prey attacks.

Monster got out the geomags. His current favourite passion is Harry Potter and he made some HP characterrs merged with Ben 10 Aliens to play with :)

Meanwhile Teeny had appeared back in the house again and was carrying out one of her favourite past times - making potions! This time it was to use to clean seaside treasures such as shells.

The cleaning idea got her thinking so she gathered up some coppers and a glass of coke to leave to soak overnight to see if what she’d heard about coke cleaning things up was true.

(it always amuses me when my autonomously Home Educated kids wind up doing the same sort of experiments that more structured HE children do, or I remember doing in school. They follow just the same formula of knowing a theory, devising a way to test it and then drawing a conclusion from the evidence but it’s all on a whim or because it’s something they heard somewhere, or an idea that just occcured to them rather than out of a book or someone else’s head).

Teeny checked the ducklings were secure and safe in their outdoor pen and we grabbed swimming costumes and headed off to the swimming pool for their weekly swimming lessons. I often go in too but didn’t today and observed them instead. Obviously I can’t take pictures in the pool so here they are brandishing swimsuits ready to go in:

and here they are an hour later on the way back out again. They both have half an hour of lesson and half an hour of free time in the bigger pool using the slide, diving boards etc. as their lesssons are staggered.

and here’s a ‘just for the fun of it’ silly photo they posed for and asked me to take and include in their day :)

and yes that is the sea you can see in the background. We love living near the beach and always mean to spend a lot more time there, but it does at least always appear in the background of our lives. We live about a mile away from the beach and probably drive past it most days, always observing the tides, what colour the ocean is and what boats, kite surfers etc. we can see out at sea.

 Back home it was teatime for Monster and Teeny, and bedtime for the ducklings who happily follow Teeny back into the house. It won’t be long before they are staying out all day and night but they have a few weeks before then and need to grow some feathers!

Usually bedtime would be a story together but today we had a dvd that everyone was wanting to watch. It didn’t really hold my attention so I went off for a bath but left Monster and Teeny and their Daddy all cuddled up together watching.

A story doesn’t have to be in a book to be enjoyed together.

Bedtime here means both Monster and Teeny listen to audio books in their beds. Teeny was listening to Chronicles of Narnia and Monster to one of the Harry Potter series. Most nights they listen for half an hour or so before feeling tired and turning the audiobook off to go to sleep. Other nights of course they listen for hours and hours and are still awake when we go to bed! As I say round here the only thing that is typical is that today will be nothing like yesterday and probably not a lot like tomorrow!

 

A temporary reprieve

April 7, 2010

Home Educators are today celebrating the fact that due to the General Election being called the clauses of the csf bill specifically targeting Home Education have been dropped. I suspect we were not as close as we’d have liked to having them dropped if the timing of the election had not been on our side, but this is to be celebrated nonetheless.

I have always said, long before it was ever mentioned in parliament that it would be naive to believe we’d continue to ‘enjoy the freedom’ we have to educate our children as we see fit right the way through our personal home ed career (currently a further 11 years should Teeny continue to be HE’d right the way through to 18), let alone should I one day have grandchildren Monster and Teeny wish to autonomously Home Educate in the same way they were.

The trouble is to the casual observer, the ‘man on the street’, the checkout operator in the supermarket, the little old lady in the post office queue, other parents, the rest of the nation it seems quite reasonable that we should be ‘checked up on’ to make sure we’re ‘doing it right’. We have, as a society, moved so far away from believing that we are capable of raising our own children, without strict guidance and help that all deviations from the norm are viewed with suspicion.

Home birth (when there are perfectly good hospitals with trained midwives and drugs?), breastfeeding (when you could measure out scoops of formula and be able to report with accurate precision to the oz how much your baby has?), not using nursery (how will they get used to being away from you? When will you get your me time?), not sending them to school. All of these make people squirm a little, feel a bit uncomfortable, maybe slightly challenge that Gina Ford /Supernanny / ‘because my health visitor said so’ comfort blanket.

I distinctly recall feeling very wobbly when I first brought Monster home from the hospital. I’d had him in hospital as I was sure I didn’t know how to have a baby. I was even surer I didn’t know what to do with one when I brought him home with me. I read books, forums, listened to friends, medical professionals, people in queues at the supermarket and found most of it conflicted either with what everyone else was saying, or with what felt right inside. I allowed myself to be pulled about by that weird form of ‘other people’s wisdom’ for nearly 2 years. But I gradually started to feel more confident about my own ability to know what was right for my child, listen to my own inner wisdom and indeed Monster himself. By the time I had Teeny I had a home birth because I was confident that my body knew precisely how to birth a baby, I became more adept at doing what felt right, what suited us as individuals and as a family, listening to myself and my children and needing only their health and happiness as proof positive that everything was going just fine.

I am worried still though. I do believe that whatever happens in the election the issue of regulation for Home Education will return. If Labour are re-elected I suspect it will be straight back on the agenda, if another party win then it may take longer but it will return to the forefront I am sure. I suspect that by putting up such a strong fight we will have shown Home Educators as a force to be reckoned with which may cause potential opponents to raise their game, and indicated just how widespread we really are, thus putting us on the radar further.

So, what is my solution? Well I don’t have one really. I do know that compromises or trying to offer some watered down solution isn’t an option for me. I detest the nanny state, the notion I mentioned above of parents not really being good enough to raise our own children. I fret that any move away from the complete autonomy to educate our children as we see fit and the ultimate responsibility for educating children remaining with parents would be a tragedy and an outrage. 

I am happy to support the welfare state through my taxes and national insurance. I think the nhs, though not without faults is a fantastic system, state education, similarly not without faults and in need of reform and improvement is something we would be a poorer nation without, ditto social services (again in need of huge reform, attention and assistance). But they just that ’services’ to be used at free will rather than imposed upon us. I want the nhs to be there should I need it for me or one of my family. I don’t want to be checked up on to make sure I am keeping myself healthy when I don’t visit the doctor. I want state education to be there for those parents and children who are not willing, able or otherwise inclined to educate at home but I don’t want to be checked up on or visited to ensure I am doing it right if I don’t use it myself for my children. I want social services there to protect the uncared for, the abused, those without a voice of their own. But can anyone remember the last case in the UK where abuse was uncovered that social services had not already been alerted to?

 The process of putting people in touch with health, education and welfare systems is, I believe, the one area we have already got right, the one area we need to tick off as done and channel attention and resources and funding towards doing it right once they have got into the system. Throw the money at ensuring every child already in school gets a decent education, that every patient on a waiting list gets seen and treated, that every family in need of support gets it, that every child suspected of not being safe or loved is given safety and love and protection from those seeking to cause them harm.

So for today, we can celebrate, tentatively and not without trepidation and expectation of further fights to come. Never letting down our guard or being aware that while we’re safe for now the end is far from in sight.

 

Singing to the choir

January 5, 2010

2009 proved to be a great year in many ways although there was the dark cloud of the Badman review and resulting fall out hanging over us.

We continue to have a dialogue with our MP, sign petitions and open letters, add our voices to those who are shouting on our behalf whilst trying not to let this threat take over our day to day life. And of course extracting every single drip of educational value to be had in learning about government, politics, parliament and how you don’t know what you’ve got til it’s gone.

We had great holidays, times with friends, new experiences, learnt new skills, found new passions and enjoyed life to the full. Some of what we set out to do happened, some didn’t, some was lost along the way because more interesting things came along instead. There were parties, new friends, old friends, laughter in the sunshine, splashing in the puddles and throwing snowballs at each other. When men in suits tried to take away our freedoms we blew bubbles in their faces, shouted loud enough for the media to listen, sat outside parliament with our banners and cluttered up their foyer in our rainbow clothes.

 

We grew fruit and vegetables while our chickens gave us eggs to eat and hatched new chickens too. This year we’ll grow even more.

So, what else is on the agenda for us in 2010? More of the same is the short answer - I know what I’m hoping the year will bring, I know what plans I have made but who can tell which way the road is going to turn once it gets out of sight? 

Monster and Teeny plan to continue with their regular groups - Wildlife Explorers, Swimming lessons, Sea Scouts, Brownies, Badgers, Young Archaeologists Club. They are going to a monthly Home Ed book club and we’re looking into circus skills, art lessons and possibly some music tuition - all in a skills swap type capacity with friends rather than formal, paid for lessons.

We have several camping trips and day trips already planned throughout the year aswell as several holidays. We’re looking forward to more parties and get togethers with friends.

Specific requests include:

Monster - learn to ride a bike, improve reading and writing through practise, he wants to attend Badger camp again (his first time away from home was a week long camping trip with Badgers in 2009, he got loads out of it and is keen to do it again this year). He wants to spend a night or two camped out in his own little tent and learn more bushcraft / forest skills / survival stuff. He’d like to learn more about animation and visit any museums or exhibitions that would help with that.

Teeny - still wants to see dolphins! We have another summer trip planned to hopefully make that happen this year (we failed last year despite holidaying in classic dolphin spotting locations and going on a dolphin spotting boat trip - we did see seals which she said were almost as good!). She’d also like to see elephants. She would like to visit a jungle, but along with her desire to stay in the ice hotel near the north pole she appreciates this might be a dream she has to realise under her own steam in years to come! ;) Teeny would also like to learn to ride a bike, improve her swimming and hatch ducklings.

I love their hopes and dreams, I love how they mix practical, academic, whimsical, achieveable and utterly outlandish. I adore that all of these feel within reach to them, I am proud that together we manage to achieve so many of the things they want to do. I love the fact that my autonomous, non-tested, no-pressure children set their own goals, give thought to the direction they want their lives to take, put effort into coming up with ideas and are heavily responsible in making them happen. 

Bit ‘o maffs

December 9, 2009

I seem to have taken part in several conversations about maths recently. One was with a very dear friend who is also a maths tutor when I shared how I had suddenly got my head round 7 x 8. It’s the single most asked times table line I think, one I always forgot when not being chanted with 6 x 8 said first (in the same was as Teeny still can’t start counting in the late teens, she needs to have started from one to get her momentum). I realised that if I think of 5 x 8 which I *know* is 40 plus 2 x 8 which I *know* is 16 and add the two together it is a sum that means something to me rather than a line from a rhyme which means nothing.

 I know there is value in mnemonics - I probably still couldn’t recite the colours or the rainbow without thinking of poor Richard of York, tell you how many days are in April without thinking of ‘30 days hath November’ or indeed ever be sure of how to spell receipt with the old ‘i before e…’ rule but I think there is a danger in relying too heavily on being able to recite words without actually corresponding them to numbers.

I’ve very deliberately not even talked about ‘maths’ as a concept to Monster and Teeny. I know far too many adults who are maths-phobic and claim to be ‘crap at maths’ despite using it in practical application every day without even thinking about it. I know my own ability to work out percentages was massively improved when working in a job with 20% staff discount, my ability to work out number bonds right up to 100 got great when I worked on tills and had to work out change, along with just knowing which coins to grab to make up the right amount in the smallest number of coins. Now I work in a library my skills at leaping plus 21 is pretty good to know what date to set stamps for books being due back.

Money, I think for most children, is a great manipulative. Time is another - from how many days til my birthday to how long til lunchtime. Does this mean that in an autonomous education there are going to be gaping holes maths-wise? Possibly. I can see there is every change pythagorus may never just crop up in day to day life but I think there is also a lot of space for crossovers of concepts to happen which for me is a good thing. I don’t see why ratios, percentages, decimals and fractions should be seperate. If you don’t need to do pages of sums for the sake of it, or divide all of this mathsiness stuff into little boxes surely the issue of ‘getting fractions but not understanding algebra’ won’t be so much of a problem?

I suspect that the ‘tricks’ of times by ten means stick another zero on the end without it actually meaning anything won’t happen here. Yesterday Teeny lost a tooth, which round here means she wakes up with a pound coin under her pillow the next morning. I overheard her and Monster chatting about counterfeiting coins which is something we talked about a while ago and whether you could ‘turn a penny into a pound’. Monster said ‘you can turn a penny into a pound by adding nine tenths of the pound and nine of the pennies to the first penny. Which seemed like a very convulted way of saying it but demonstrated he has grasped fractions with his 9/10 and presumably units, tens and hundreds too. He then said there must be one thousand pennies in ten pounds which they both ‘whoa’ d at for a while as that seems loads and finally he clarified with me that 10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10+10 is the same as 10x10. 

I think DS games, board games, toys like lego and geomags which involve counting pieces to construct and general life with the need to use numeracy to exist means Maths holds no fear for them, as and when life dictates they need to add another ability to their numeracy to work something out they learn how to do it either by trial and error or asking. At some point if they do need to get a maths qualification I have no doubt it would be pretty straightforward to pull all of that practical application experience together, realise that all of those different ideas have names and rules attached and can be seperated out and categorised but that basically it’s all just moving numbers about in slightly different sizes and methods.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

Lord Lucas in da house - ah yeah!

November 27, 2009

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200910/ldhansrd/text/91126-0011.htm#09112630000780

Lord Lucas: My Lords, it is a great pleasure to follow that speech, and I think that I agree with every part of it, especially the bit saying that we have the right to spend our own money on ourselves and have fun, so our children had better learn to work for a living. As I get older I agree with that more and more, although I do not think I did 40 years ago.

I am going to devote my speech to the home education part of the education Bill-although I cannot call it that because the word "education" has been expunged from every Bill and from the title of the department. I shall refer to it as the schools Bill. Several clauses are devoted to the regulation of home education; that is, people who educate their children at home. This part of the Bill is ill thought-out and unjustified, and I hope very much that we will delete it. In its current form it is a skeleton exposing home educators and their children to the unknown because so much will depend on how the regulations are written. Nothing in it secures their rights as home educators to look after their children in the way they see best. There is an unfortunate conflation of education and welfare which makes the business of improving or looking after the education of these children much harder.

There is no recognition in the Bill of the curricula and forms of education which are commonly used in home education, particularly in autonomous education. Instead, the impact assessment refers to the exemplar curricula which will be produced by the QCDA. In other words, everyone is to be corralled into state education and not allowed to go their own way. There is no reference to the training of local authority staff, which is recognised to be one of the major deficiencies in the current arrangements. There is no proper arrangement for independent appeal when a local authority decides that a person may not home educate. There is a skeleton in the Bill, but it is a skeleton that could be filled out in almost any way.

In this country, we have long had a duty as parents to educate our children and a right to decide how they should be educated. Many of us choose to entrust the state with their education-but that is us entrusting the state with our duty and us exercising our right to choose. The Bill turns that on his head. The arrangement here is that you cannot home educate unless you get the prior permission of the local authority, which has wide grounds for refusing. It can object in any way to your plans to educate your child. It can object and refuse you permission to home educate if you do not allow someone from the local education authority four hours of unaccompanied access to your child every year. Would we contemplate allowing that for our children under any circumstances? What right have these people to do that to home-educated children when there is no real cause for concern?

We are considering a section of the Bill which will cost £20 million per annum, which is about £1,000 per home-educated child. These children receive no money to help pay the costs of examinations; no money to buy textbooks; no money to buy materials; no money and no tuition to help them over difficulties in education. Now the Government can find £1,000 for each of these children-and will spend it on auditing them. Not one penny will go to help the children; it will all go on auditing them. What have these people done to deserve that?

Four separate communities are bundled together under the title of home education. First, there are those who opt for what might properly be called "elective home education". They are people who have decided, as a matter of principle, that they will pursue an educational philosophy which is not available from the state. Most of this is autonomous education; most of it is a form of education which does not involve curricula or planning but involves going on a journey with children which results in education. This is, of its nature, foreign to many school-based systems, but it has proved immensely successful.

The second group might be called "the despairing". These are people whose children have been bullied at school to the point where they will no longer go to school; or those who have children with special educational needs which are not being properly catered for and who have therefore decided to turn their lives upside down and educate their children themselves. These people do society a great deal of good by doing so.

The third group consists of the Travellers, who are bundled in here as home educators, which many of them are. Finally, there is what one might call the
 

"year 11" children-those who have always been trouble; who have always truanted; whose truanting has got worse and worse; whose parents are not in control of them either; and who in the last year or so of school just go home and sit watching television. They are classed as "home education" because it is a convenient way for the local authority to classify them.

We do not have a coherent pattern that can be used to produce a coherent set of statistics. All this has been conflated with a worry-I associate it with the NSPCC; perhaps it comes from elsewhere-that a lot of abuse is somehow going on in the home education community. Page 90 of the impact assessment quotes the NSPCC:

"We are concerned that the child’s safety and welfare should be paramount and that there is nothing in the current guidance or framework that would prevent children from being abused by people who may claim to be home educators".

That sentence applies equally to all of us who are bringing up children. Local authorities are not conducting any supervision of me as a parent to make sure that I am not abusing my children. "That is a bad thing; something must be done about it"; that is what is being said about home-educating families-on the basis of what?

This is probably the first time that I have paid attention to a Bill’s impact assessment, but it is an immensely useful document. It sets out the rationale of the Bill and the concerns that underlie the Government’s perceived need to introduce this section. It states that local authorities estimate that,

    "8% of ‘home educated’ children are receiving no education at all and 20% are not receiving a suitable education".

That would be concerning if it were true, but it is not.

To understand what is going wrong here, one needs to understand the process that the Government have gone through, with a rushed assessment of the situation under Graham Badman and three successive rounds of applications to local authorities for data, each of them seemingly compiled by a different team because they are none of them consistent with each other. None of them seems to be compiled by people who have an understanding of home education or of local authority practices. Different local authorities respond to the same questions on different bases, understanding them in different ways, providing different kinds of answers and following different rules. From that, the Government have derived a set of high-level statistics such as the one that I have just quoted.

Before Prorogation, I asked a couple of questions of the Minister on this matter. The department refused to answer, saying that it could not provide me with the underlying data because they were confidential. I shall ask similar questions again now. If I receive that same answer, we shall be off to see the Leader of the House, because I consider it deeply disrespectful of this House. These data are there and are available. The Minister may have a team looking at the data. On the other side are 10,000 intelligent, angry, committed home-educating parents finding out the same information. All the information is in the public domain, but how have the Government got their high-level results from it?

Let us look at the 8 per cent who are receiving no education at all. Local education authorities have a duty to make sure that children are receiving a suitable
 

education. A figure of 8 per cent would mean an astonishing level of dereliction. A huge number of local authorities would be in complete breach of their requirements and not using their well established powers to bring children into education. Of course, that is not the case at all. Part of it appears to be a deliberate misreading of the figures provided by local authorities; part of it is rolling in a chunk of the Traveller population, who are already separately provided for by local authorities which have well understood the requirements of them but have included them in the "receiving no education" category. Part of it is the "year 11" problem, which is local authorities’ own problem resulting from things going on in their own schools. When you get down to the residual question of how many properly home-educated children are not being educated, it is somewhere well under 1 per cent-if indeed one can identify any numbers at all.

 

Dear Ed Balls and the DCSF, No, thank you.

October 15, 2009

Here is what I owe my children:

  • Unconditional love. Always and forever. The knowlegde that nothing they can ever do will ever change the way I feel about them. I will always take their side, support their cause, fight their corner. Noone else owes them this but it is most certainly their right from me.
  • To provide for their most basic needs; to feed them, clothe them, shelter them, to protect them from harm.
  • To listen to them, always. From their first cries as moments old infants when all they could do was articulate hunger, discomfort or pain, to knowing when to hold their tiny hand in mine so they could toddle, to knowing when the time was right to let go so they could walk alone. To recognising an interest and a passsion and introducing new ideas, facilitating their learning, answering their questions, to one day toasting their independance as they move out of my care, meet their life partner, become parents themselves, climb a mountain, sail a sea, hell flip a burger if that’s what they’ve chosen to do! I will hear them.
  • To teach them, not necessarily right from wrong but how to make that differentiation for themselves. To give them choices and help them see how to use them. To show them they have wings, tell them they can fly and to stand back while they spread them, then cheer them on from below.

Here is what you owe my children:

  • To allow me to do all of the above. Use the funds that come from MY taxes to provide the services to pick up the slack where I cannot. Give me doctors, nurses, hospitals, schools and teachers, law and justice, refuse collection, library services, social services, pensions, healthcare, defence, safe roads, decent public transport, street lights, clean parks and beaches, free museums. Where I need them I will use them, where I don’t I will not. Allow me to make those choices.

The children who are vulnerable worry us all. I cry to think of children not being properly cared for, being abused, being neglected, being failed by both their parents and by you. I feel sick at the thought of just one child suffering and knowing the fate of all those high profile cases of children failed by Social Services. Known to them, visited by them, reported on by them but not saved by them.

 

The children who are not getting an education make me so very sad. For them, for their parents who trusted you to deliver when they delegated to your schools to educate their children. The children coming out the other end of years of state education lacking not just formal qualifications but basic literacy and numeracy skills. The children tested by your exams,  sat in classrooms run by your teachers but not educated by them.

Your models do not work for all who need them. You are failing. This is where time, funds, energy, resources, reviews and revolutions are required. You are not achieving all you set out to do.

I on the other hand am. I am meeting all my targets despite having my bar set really very high. My model is working. Here is my evidence, now move along, there is nothing to see here and I believe you have plenty to keep you busy elsewhere.

 

Waiting for the axe to fall

September 22, 2009

Monster and Teeny have never been to school or nursery. We’ve never hidden our Home Ed status when directly asked but we’re not ‘known’ either. When the forms came for school places I chucked them in the recycling. A reminder came for Monster, cautioning that if we didn’t return them we might not get a place in our favoured school. As we didn’t want a place in any school I recycled that too. If at any point we’d been asked to clarify exactly what we were doing with regard to the children’s education then we’d have replied that we were making private arrangements, but noone ever asked so we never told.

I remember myself asking incredulously about testing, checking, someone making sure we were doing it properly when we first started researching Home Ed, which just goes to show how indoctrinated I had been in the ‘nanny knows best’ mentality of the UK. It seemed amazing that we were allowed to do this and didn’t have to ask anyone’s permission. Whilst I am now a very long, very enlightened way from that thinking (I’m choosing to blame it on having a newborn and a toddler at the time ;) ) I have always thought it would be naive to imagine we will retain such freedom all the way to Teeny reaching 18 and the end of formal education age. I never gave much thought to how things might change however and enjoyed the freedom of allowing Monster and Teeny to discover  how Home Education would best suit them and through a journey of discovery, constant reevaluation, conversation and experimentation we are achieving just that.

 

In our opinion.

 

Which is where it begins to get scary really. Because up to this point it has only been our opinion that counted. For me, it still is and that is precisely as it should be. But thanks to Ed Balls’ Home Education review and Graham Badman’s report and recommendations our opinion is looking likely to count for less and less.

I firmly believe that all of life is experimental. I believe parenting is incredibly experimental and the many, many manuals, approaches and pieces of advice available on the subject back this up really. There is no set way to rear a child because children are people and people are individuals. There is nature and nurture at play, a whole load of demographic variables, different experiences, fate, accident, health, wealth, intellect and much, much more which makes up the sum total of who we are at the end of our childhood, let alone at the end of our lives. As such education should be the same, a voyage of discovery, predominantly self-directed, never ending, constantly tangenting and evolving depending on all those external influences I just mentioned.

This works for us. Monster and Teeny are stimulated, interested, engaged, curious, busy, motivated, open to any and all new experience, full of questions and the ability to find answers to them. For them, for us and for pretty much everyone who comes across us our Home Ed is deemed to be a success. Very subjective I know, but then isn’t everything in life? Subjective and relative - wealth, health, happiness, intellect, appearance, education. Is that not what makes humans so very fascinating and interesting? Our diversity and differences? Our varied perspective and opinions? Our diverse experiences and dreams?

Fingers crossed the Select Committee will debunk the Badman report and see all that is wrong with it. Fingers crossed the sterling work of so many of the Home Educators I am proud to be one of will enlighten the government and maybe the public at large that we’re doing fine and don’t need to have any of the ridiculous and downright terrifying restrictions and regulations enforced on us. May the picnics, the mass lobby, the letters and visits to our MPs, the press coverage, the bloggers, the fab work of HEYC and all of the other amazing positives that have come about as a result of this will do their job and we’ll be left alone to continue doing what we do, answering to ourselves and making it work for us, in our opinion.

If not I guess we just fight and deal with one point at a time. In theory there is no need to register, they can simply merge their databases and by elimination put us on a register as Home Educators. If not, if we need to queue up somewhere to add our names what will happen if we don’t? Will we be prosecuted? Will our children be taken away into care? Will they be forced into schools? How will this be managed? If they can’t create the register without us registering how will they find us anyway? What punishment will be levied for not complying and how will they find all those additional school places anyway?

If they want to visit us in our homes will they need search warrants? On what legal basis will they have right of entry? What if we’re not home? How will they find enough staff and get them properly trained to come and visit us all anyway? A quick google shows there are about 20,000 schools in the UK (private and state) which even at conservative estimates of HE families means there are more homes in which children are educated than schools in this country - that’s a hell of a lot of homes to get round.

If we submit an annual plan to be held accountable to who will read it? How will they measure us against it? We cannot and will not forward plan our lives in that way. I will detail what we’ve learnt this past year and state that we plan more of the same for the coming year. That will surely suffice given the richness and breadth and balance of a year in our lives and all the opportunities it offers. 

As an optimist I have to believe that this madness will be halted before it goes further. I have to believe that no matter how crazy or unreasonable the hoops we asked to jump through become there will be a way through them while retaining what is important to us. We are resouceful, creative people with imagination and passion for what we believe in, we will find the way to navigate a new path through, even if the landscape becomes steeper, harder and stonier.

Monster (10)
and Teeny (7)
have never been to school or nursery. We began to think about Home Education about 7 years ago and have gradually combined education with our day to day life. For now we follow no structure, no curriculum and go wherever life - and our imagination - leads us. This blog is an occassional record of where life has led us....